Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Eliminate the "Offer Your Reply" links

by Argel (Prior)
on Feb 07, 2011 at 23:21 UTC ( #886843=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Eliminate the "Offer Your Reply" links

That link is only really useful until someone has replied to the post. If you could check if there is a reply or not, then you could use that as the deciding factor on when to display it.

With that said, I never use it and would welcome freeing up some additional screen real-estate.

Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks


Comment on Re: RFC: Eliminate the "Offer Your Reply" links
Re^2: RFC: Eliminate the "Offer Your Reply" links (if)
by tye (Cardinal) on Feb 09, 2011 at 06:16 UTC

    That's the best idea yet. If there are no responses (and no 'readmore' tags?), give an "Offer your reply" link (or "Post a response" or whatever the standardized wording ends up being). If there are replies, give a "Read more/Contribute" link (that just duplicates the functionality of clicking on the thread title, which is good because the result of clicking on the title is a common convention but isn't actually described for those unfamiliar with the convention).

    Actually, replace "Offer your reply" with either a pair of links, "Read more | Post response", or a single link, "Read more / Contribute".

    - tye        

Re^2: RFC: Eliminate the "Offer Your Reply" links
by steve (Deacon) on Feb 09, 2011 at 15:27 UTC
    I agree with Argel, it does make sense to have those links for posts with no replies yet. With that being said it seems that having a difference in the display for posts which have replies and those without replies will lead to wasted space on the majority of content on the site. The only idea I have is to make the "0 direct replies" link direct traffic to the reply page, or move the "offer your reply" link next to the "0 direct replies" link.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://886843]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (12)
As of 2014-12-22 14:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (119 votes), past polls