Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (self reply++)

by tye (Cardinal)
on Feb 10, 2011 at 04:37 UTC ( #887338=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (UPDATE NOTICE)
in thread RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (logged out view)

I realize it can be considered bad form to reply to your own post

I've heard that many times. I don't subscribe to that view. Replying to yourself is much better than making major updates to a node. So, replying to note major updates to a node is rather the worst of both choices.

- tye        


Comment on Re^2: RFC: A Design Proposed for Anonymous Monk (self reply++)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://887338]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-08-29 23:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (289 votes), past polls