Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Documentation: POD vs Comments (visual)

by parv (Priest)
on Jul 22, 2011 at 18:22 UTC ( #916185=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Documentation: POD vs Comments (visual)
in thread Documentation: POD vs Comments

Other than the sad scenario of leaving ${EDITOR:-vim}, what do you think of meld?

After working with meld, I found myself lost when presented with "emerge" window. I should really look into a ${"merge tool":-vimdiff} that runs in xterm. (sdiff(1) -- while using "mergemaster" -- is too tedius to work with when faced with lines longer than a few words.)

  • Comment on Re^5: Documentation: POD vs Comments (visual)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://916185]
help
Chatterbox?
[hippo]: ... and a boatload of good stuff in On Coding Standards and Code Reviews
[Yary]: Looking at system pm's, looks like it's "package" on the first line, then POD, then "use 5.xyz;use strict; use warnings; use modules..."
[Yary]: ah thanks for those links
[hippo]: Just bear in mind that all such ideas are subjective.
[choroba]: There might be a different standard at the shop you write the code for.
[choroba]: The order of package - (strict+warnings | warnings+strict) - modules makes sense, POD and strict-warnings order are not so important

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-01-23 17:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?