in reply to Re: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
in thread Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
Do you have centralized or distributed SW development? On my project we only have centralized development. I didn't see the advantage to move to a distributed approach and was happy to make to step from CVS to SVN (for us already a big step!). SVN works fine for us. We have many tools and Subversion is well supported in terms of plugins for integration (Jira, Hudson etc.) Could you think of reasons to use a distributed approach while having only centralized SW development? I could be wrong but it sounds like adding complexity for something I don't really need. I could be completely wrong though;)
Cheers
Harry
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Mar 26, 2012 at 16:53 UTC | |
Re^3: Thoughts on Git, Mercurial, Github, and Bitbucket.
by GrandFather (Saint) on Mar 26, 2012 at 20:06 UTC | |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Mar 26, 2012 at 20:14 UTC | |
by DrHyde (Prior) on Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51 UTC |