Re^4: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by BrowserUk (Pope)

on May 31, 2012 at 13:41 UTC ( #973523=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

I don't see why:

~                               ~              ~
 > is any less acceptable than =   or $bool &=  $mask;
[download]

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^4: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing? Download Code
Re^5: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing? by phaylon (Curate) on May 31, 2012 at 15:02 UTC
One is supposed to look like an arrow, the other one doesn't. It's actually a good demonstration. In your scenario, ~> would be much closer to the other operators using ~ than to the deref operator. Ordinary morality is for ordinary people. -- Aleister Crowley	[reply]

In Section Past Polls

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://973523]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others meditating upon the Monastery: (9)

As of 2013-05-19 22:08 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?