Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

by Anonymous Monk
on Aug 13, 2012 at 01:46 UTC ( #987013=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code
in thread Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

closures really?

I'd rather use die/croak and a something like Catalyst::Plugin::ErrorCatcher

  • Comment on Re^3: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Perl Elitist Code vs Functional Code
by tobyink (Abbot) on Aug 13, 2012 at 05:59 UTC

    Yes, closures are how Sub::Exporter works. Moose uses Sub::Exporter under the hood to export its has, extends, etc keywords. has, extends, etc are all closures. Catalyst is Moose-based. You use Catalyst; you're using closures.

    Catalyst is Plack-based. Plack is an implementation of the PSGI spec. Under PSGI all web apps are closures. You use Catalyst; you're using closures.

    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://987013]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2016-10-01 17:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?






    Results (2 votes). Check out past polls.