Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Aug 13, 2012 at 16:23 UTC ( #987150=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler

Your reply wins the "most useless and clueless answer of 2012" prize.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics


Comment on Re^3: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler
Reaped: Re^4: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler
by NodeReaper (Curate) on Aug 13, 2012 at 17:18 UTC
Re^4: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 14, 2012 at 07:31 UTC

    Flexvault said

    So why can't Perl have a '-Compile' like the '-cw' compiler flags that produces a bitecode that can be shipped and run. Every one knows that someone that wants to get the code can, but the casual 'expert' would be deterred by '...It looks like 'C' to me!'

    Anonymous Monk said

    If you don't want "customers" diddling the code, you can use PerlApp/CavaPackager/PAR (with filters, crypto/whitespace, even used to be a B::Bytecode filter )

    CountZero said

    Your reply wins the "most useless and clueless answer of 2012" prize.

    You're wrong CountZero and rude.

      I am not wrong and I am not rude. :)

      Perl does not have a "compile" flag for all the good reasons explained in this discussion, so your argument is invalid ab initio.

      Packing Perl code is just a thinly disguised "zipping" of the interpreter + modules + script. Adding some source-filter code will not make it any more secure or less prone to be looked into. Anyone who can open a Perl File and start a Google search will find countless links to undo the obfuscation. Therefore Anonymous Monk's comment was wrong and likely to misguide our young Monks.

      CountZero

      A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

      My blog: Imperial Deltronics

        You are being pointlessly rude and you are wrong for most definitions of wrong. Rinse and repeat ... the original request was for something that: "Every one knows that someone that wants to get the code can, but the casual 'expert' would be deterred by '...It looks like 'C' to me!'"

        You seem to be expecting very clever "experts".

        Jenda
        Enoch was right!
        Enjoy the last years of Rome.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://987150]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-10-21 14:11 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (104 votes), past polls