Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: RFC: New style for argument check in subs

by chip (Curate)
on Sep 10, 2012 at 07:48 UTC ( #992695=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
in thread RFC: New style for argument check in subs

Method::Signatures -- yes, I am serious. It's good.

Method::Signatures::Simple -- yes, I am serious again. It's still good.

The computer can handle working harder. You can't.

    -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos


Comment on Re^3: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
Re^4: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
by LanX (Canon) on Sep 10, 2012 at 09:49 UTC
    I don't deny it's good, but I have serious problems with such dependencies.

    If it' so good make it core and I'll use it as soon as Debian supports the perlversion.

    In the meantime I like a good style which works w/o XS dependencies.

    Cheers Rolf

      Long experience has taught me that distribution Perl, including Debian, exists to support the code in the distribution, not to support a Perl developer. I strongly recommend building your own Perl and not avoiding XS. Your choice, of course.

          -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos

        nope, not my choice, corporate's choice.

        Cheers Rolf

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://992695]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-11-28 10:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (195 votes), past polls