Yes! It side-steps domain knowledge. Lets expand on this point.
Consider this code:
if ($a->is_xxx_yyy && $b < PPP_QQQ) { ... }
An experienced Perl coder would instantly, subconciously, grok the control-flow within it. Part of this understanding relies on convention, so could be subverted, but just look at the amount of information/expectation we have:
- $a is an object (the -> operator)
- is_xxx_yyy is a predicate (starts with word "is")
- is_xxx_yyy has no side effects (because its a predicate)
- If is_xxx_yyy is false, then $b is irrelevant (&& short-circuits)
- PPP_QQQ is a constant (upper-case)
- PPP_QQQ is numeric (the numeric comparison)
- $b is numeric (ditto)
- The rhs has a single boundary (the inequality).
So we'd know that there are 3 paths through the control logic of the if statement, and be able to see how they interact. Bad coders could subvert my expectations (e.g. they could add side-effects to the predicate): but "hard cases make bad law".
Compare this with an abstracted function call:
if (xxx_yyy_ppp_qqq($a,$b))
The perl-brain gleams no information from this. Understanding it relies entirely on the quality of the name of the identifier. And we all know how hard it is to create a really good identifier name.
--Dave
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|