laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Sorry you feel insulted, but without a mechanism "... to fix the implementation ...", the idea *is* 'academic'. As in: Conversly, avoiding unnecessary levels of function calling is a real, practical, fruitful way of achieving better performance, where that is required, available to anyone who needs it right now. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
The "good enough" maybe good enough for the now, and perfection maybe unobtainable, but that should not preclude us from striving for perfection, when time, circumstance or desire allow.
In reply to Re^6: Performance, Abstraction and HOP
by BrowserUk
|
|