Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Programming is harder than rocket science, because it still doesn't have a firm mathematical machinery behind it. Yes, there is lambda calculus and other calculi, theory of infinite and finite automata, Boolean algebra, and other strands in mathematics that define the entire field. But what we miss is useful things rocket engineers can use: analysis and algebra. Set up the initial conditions and requirements as equations, and derive a solution, for instance (say) solving Newton's laws of motion for an accelerating rocket engine. We don't have any of that, much less laws of motion.

There are several reasons why there is no such thing:

  • Social resistance. Your job is secure if you don't frame and divulge your knowledge explicitly.
  • Artificial complexity. It seems to be human nature to create order where it is not really needed (in terms of reaching the goal).
  • Real complexity. Many requirements are impossible to express with mathematical precision; some are fuzzy, some change frequently, some have temporal qualities that cannot be encoded in predicate logic, etc.
  • A part of programming is an art. Perhaps due to inadequate notation, or deficiencies in education, or simply because it requires a certain way of thinking that not everyone can do, you do need tacit knowledge to do anything.

So even if you tried to be precise about the requirements, you will be swamped by (unnecessary) detail and complexity. Perhaps we just need to develop better abstractions.

print "Just Another Perl Adept\n";

In reply to Re: Programming is more like: by vrk
in thread Programming is more like: by Arunbear

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    [LanX]: readme version number and so on ...
    [stevieb]: with M::S, you can also add other tags, but defaults work... such as --license=perl --eumm
    [LanX]: I'm not a big fan of pure make, apparently the auto generated ones are so complicated to be able to work with all possible makes
    [stevieb]: I find the M::S makefiles it generates are quite straight forward, and I usually have to add a few things (github info etc). They're about 15 lines or so give or take.
    [Corion]: I don't think the EUMM-generated Makefile is that complicated ;)
    [stevieb]: Corion++
    [jedikaiti]: RonW++ #I have so much accumulated in my memory that finding the right item at a given moment often fails
    [LanX]: corion only > 800 lines

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (6)
    As of 2017-08-18 21:00 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?
      Who is your favorite scientist and why?

      Results (310 votes). Check out past polls.