http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1014028


in reply to Re^2: Lightweight Perl CMS
in thread Lightweight Perl CMS

thanks again anonymous..
I never started to use heavly a webframework nor a CMS (obviosly Perl ones) for lack of affordable information. And the related fear to find myself, 5 years after, with a mess of buggy code that is hard or impossible to maintain..

I do not stay all the day on the net to search news or test on tis subjects (is a limit.. maybe) and Perlmonks is the only online communty where i lurk.

So when some wise monk state that something is reliable i go there and i pick up.

I have not found this for web develop so i never started with some and i still remain with my CGI

I think that web develop is still a battlefield where Perl can win but there is not a solid stone on which build that house, like was with CGI.pm in the past.

I hope in the future(sometimes)..

thanks again for starting tips about Perl web dev judgement.
there are no rules, there are no thumbs..

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Lightweight Perl CMS
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 18, 2013 at 10:33 UTC

    I think that web develop is still a battlefield where Perl can win but there is not a solid stone on which build that house, like was with CGI.pm in the past.

    Sure there is, Plack, Plack, Plack, Plack, Plack,

    mojolicious, dancer, dancer2, cgi-application, catalyst, squatting, all run on plack