in reply to Regex re_eval - requires explicit package name
Should I consider this a bug?
I think probably not, I vaguely recall that with this experimental feature, you're supposed to use dynamic/local vars instead of lexical/my vars
update: Re: (??{ code }) versus (?PARNO) for recursive regular expressions (lexicals won't stay shared ), Variable scoping oddity inside (??{ ... }), (??{ lexical variable }), Scoping issues with code evaluation asserstions?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Regex re_eval - requires explicit package name
by dave_the_m (Monsignor) on Jan 20, 2013 at 14:02 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom