http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1065553


in reply to Re^9: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Also, it seems like there is some disagreement about whether a "Perl" project (like RPerl) should be licensed under Artistic v1 or Artistic v2. Can you give me input on that please?
  • Comment on Re^10: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by ysth (Canon) on Dec 05, 2013 at 07:20 UTC
    If you are free to choose, that is, if you are not dependent on code that can't be relicensed, absolutely go for v2.
    --
    A math joke: r = | |csc(θ)|+|sec(θ)| |-| |csc(θ)|-|sec(θ)| |
[reply]
      ysth,

      RPerl does specifically do #include "perl.h" to work correctly, I assume this means I am dependent on Artistic v1 code and thus can't use Artistic v2?

      Thanks,
      ~ Will
[reply]

In Section Perl News