Re^5: Security: Dancer Session cookie swap

[eyepopslikeamosquito]

You just love to invoke BrowserUK ... if you look through his posting history not once has he called you a piece of shit

I would really like to understand why he singles out BrowserUk so often, far more than any other monk. Some examples to support this claim:

• Re^2: Overtime: the "Bad News" Warning Sign: "It is easy to know from hearing you "speak" that you have been around this block many times: yours is the voice of well-seasoned experience."
• Re: Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems: "what BrowserUK said here is, in my opinion, excellent wisdom, well thought-out and presented"
• Re^2: map2 {} grep2 {} ...: "An excellent suggestion. Fav'd."
• Re^2: Annoying 'Use of uninitialized value in concatenation' warning: "as BrowserUK wisely suggests"
• Re: What's Wrong with program: "such ideas having already been given to you, and in great detail by experts such as BrowserUK"
• Re^4: Faster push and shift: "Quite obviously, BrowserUK very routinely processes gigantic datasets during the course of his work day. He is quite the expert on those (what are to many of us...) edge cases. Upvoted."
• Re: Concurrent Cache Pattern: "I say this in all seriousness, BrowserUK could whip one up in about three minutes"
• Re: how apply large memory with perl?: "BrowserUK's algorithm is of course more efficient, and he has the RAM."
• Re^3: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler: "BrowserUK, I specifically acknowledge that your work is an exception to that statement, and very impressive work it certainly is."
• Re^3: Does IO::Select work? (Problem partially resolved): "If BrowserUK said it, yes, he is sure. And sure to be right. Seriously."
• Re: Evolving a faster filter?: "I am certain that this thread will attract the attention of BrowserUK, who is well-known about these parts to be especially expert in high-performance algorithms in high-volume situations. I especially look forward to his insights on this subject."
• Re^5: Optimization Help: "BrowserUK has a well-earned reputation for doing things like that"
• Re: Problem with Threaded Socket Server: "Adding one more thought (in case I missed it) to BrowserUK’s excellent recommendations here ... (++)x2"
• Re^4: Fastest way to download many web pages in one go?: "An excellent and well-reasoned analysis ...   “++”"
• Re^3: Proper undefine queue with multithreads: "I simply suggest that you should follow BrowserUK’s sage advice exactly as given ... take BrowserUK’s excellent recommendations, and go"

Your claim that he has not once called him "a piece of shit" appears to be correct, at least the only occurrences of the word "shit" or "crap" I found are:

• Re^2: Tracing memory leak: "Care to explain by what magic of "old bullshitter" logic you arrived at the conclusion that the OP was constructing self-referential structures?"
• Re^3: Negative voting: "Bullshit!"
• Re^2: Pause and Resume Exe: "Yet more crap!"

Despite the lavish praise regularly dished out from sundialsvc4 to BrowserUk, I can't find a single instance of that love being returned. On the contrary, the criticisms have been very harsh.