http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=18345


in reply to RE: Thoughts on voting and reputations
in thread Thoughts on voting and reputations

Hmm, right idea, wrong reason, I feel. I think SuperCruncher's node was misguided but not really bad enough to justify a jihad against it. Worst nodes should get there of their own accord - this is the reason we don't get to see reputations before we vote on a node, and the reason for the caveat at Best Nodes.