http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=238729


in reply to Re^3: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain
in thread RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain

Order is relative. Since everything else in perl that applies something to something else has the application block first that way reads more naturally to me in perl.

To-mah-to. To-may-to. :-)

Roll on perl6. With ~> and <~ and we can both be happy :-)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: RFC: Class::Proxy::MethodChain
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Feb 27, 2003 at 19:35 UTC
    Guess there's points to be made for either choice. It seems to be a matter largely of choosing between clear but verbose and concise but less obvious approaches.. the question is when verbosity detracts from clarity and when not - a choice that's probably going to be taken differently by every programmer. Well, given Perl 6 (pun intended), we won't have to choose.. now if only it was here.

    Makeshifts last the longest.