in reply to Re^7: PERL as shibboleth and the Perl community
in thread PERL as shibboleth and the Perl community
Just out of curiousity, I've always wondered whether you lawyer people have to put disclaimers like that whenever you say something that is vaguely like legal advice? Is it just habit from other scenarios? Is it so drilled into your collective heads in law school that you must disclaim everything which you aren't getting paid for and you thus just do it out of habit? Even though its probably not really necessary?
I mean, here we are on a public site, you are using a semi-anonymous account, your comment contains nothing like a directive to the person you are replying to, etc. Is there really a risk that you or some or other lawyer in such a context could have issues if you dont explicitly disclaim your comments? I could understand such a risk in other contexts, but here? Or on a list site like groklaw or whatever?
And I ask this fully understanding that you are not my lawyer and that whatever you say is understood to be under the disclaimer we are discussing. :-)
$world=~s/war/peace/g
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^9: PERL as shibboleth and the Perl community (ot: disclaimer necessary?)
by SamCG (Hermit) on Jan 20, 2006 at 15:46 UTC |