Re^2: OO Design question: configuration

in reply to Re: OO Design question: configuration
in thread OO Design question: configuration

Huge thanks for pointing me to this. I have never heard of IOC (now it's more popularly called DI - Dependency Injection) before, but it sounds just like the thing I had in mind.

Comment on Re^2: OO Design question: configuration

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: OO Design question: configuration by stvn (Monsignor) on May 21, 2007 at 17:15 UTC
now it's more popularly called DI - Dependency Injection Yeah, I had it called that originally, the it grew into a larger "Inversion of Control" framework with the Proxy objects and such. However, once I started actually using it in practice, I found I had little need for the proxies, but by then it was too late to change the name. Plus, IOC was better as a namespace name, whereas DI is just kinda ugly :) -stvn	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: OO Design question: configuration
by stvn (Monsignor) on May 21, 2007 at 17:15 UTC

now it's more popularly called DI - Dependency Injection

Yeah, I had it called that originally, the it grew into a larger "Inversion of Control" framework with the Proxy objects and such. However, once I started actually using it in practice, I found I had little need for the proxies, but by then it was too late to change the name.

Plus, IOC was better as a namespace name, whereas DI is just kinda ugly :)

-stvn

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom