in reply to Re: Site facelift?
in thread Site facelift?
I have been reading perlmonks for more than 7 years, and IMO the OP is right. It's slow and I can think of some (optional!) javascript functions that help following the threads (I can think of it because I implemented it in my own software. You know the software, is it more complicated to use than perlmonks?)
The problem is that the software here seems unmaintainable and that the server has some problems that have to do with a combination of OS and database. And of course with a lack of time that people have. But why do people here react almost offended when somebody tells the truth? At least the slowness is a fact, although it seems impossible at the moment to do something about it.
The problem is that the software here seems unmaintainable and that the server has some problems that have to do with a combination of OS and database. And of course with a lack of time that people have. But why do people here react almost offended when somebody tells the truth? At least the slowness is a fact, although it seems impossible at the moment to do something about it.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Site facelift?
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 18, 2010 at 11:06 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 18, 2010 at 11:16 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Nov 18, 2010 at 11:36 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion