in reply to Re: RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?
in thread RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?
Unlike strict, which is sometimes helpful and almost never harmful, warnings is very much a mixed bag, "use of uninitialized value" being the most obvious example of its harmfulness. Making it genuinely useful requires a lot of work (see e.g. common::sense), and most people aren't willing to put in that much effort. Lumping strict and warnings together is a mistake.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: RFC: Tutorial: use strict; now what!?
by Eliya (Vicar) on Feb 08, 2012 at 17:43 UTC | |
by educated_foo (Vicar) on Feb 08, 2012 at 18:02 UTC | |
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Feb 08, 2012 at 18:58 UTC | |
by educated_foo (Vicar) on Feb 08, 2012 at 19:08 UTC | |
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Feb 08, 2012 at 19:38 UTC | |
| |
by Eliya (Vicar) on Feb 08, 2012 at 18:21 UTC | |
|
In Section
Meditations