Re^5: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1064082

in reply to Re^4: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

you swapped my sentences and words, and then speculating about this changed content...

i hereby announce your broken quote of my text as not containing mine thoughts and thus declare your reply invalid...

dixi

Comment on Re^5: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2013 at 01:05 UTC
1+2=3; 2+1=3; 1+1+1=3; vkon non sequitur	[reply]
Re^7: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by vkon (Curate) on Nov 24, 2013 at 16:01 UTC
what does this mean? Looks like garbage.... give me a favour - pleae do not bother distracting me with your meaningless replies	[reply]
Re^8: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 9: RPerl.org & The Low-Magic Perl Commandments by Anonymous Monk on Nov 24, 2013 at 16:55 UTC
what does this mean? It means you reading comprehension is "epic fail", you don't understand simple logic Looks like garbage.... take off your glasses? give me a favour - pleae do not bother distracting me with your meaningless replies ditto	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations