Re: Re: XML::XPath

in reply to Re: XML::XPath
in thread XML::XPath

XML::XPath has been in maintainence mode for a long time now. That means I'm not changing or fixing the API (much) and I'm not doing any personal work on it (if you want a more complete DOM + XPath module look to XML::LibXML). If anyone wants things fixed (like documentation) they're going to have to send patches, sorry.

Comment on Re: Re: XML::XPath

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: XML::XPath by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 20, 2003 at 08:41 UTC
No apoligies necessary, my comments weren't intended as critisism, just a note of the situation as I found it and an attempt to take the sting away from the OP who had failed to find the `removeChild()` call, which is indeed, fairly self-expanatory once you know it's there. Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: XML::XPath
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Aug 20, 2003 at 08:41 UTC

No apoligies necessary, my comments weren't intended as critisism, just a note of the situation as I found it and an attempt to take the sting away from the OP who had failed to find the removeChild() call, which is indeed, fairly self-expanatory once you know it's there.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom