(Ovid) Re: Returning contents of subrules matches with Parse::RecDescent

[Ovid]

Heh. Waiting for someone to vote you down because you mentioned that another language was sometimes superior to Perl :) (I won't vote someone down for that, though)

I don't know Parse::RecDescent...yet. However, as a matter of style, might I suggest that you reduct this to a minimal test case in which the problem is replicable? Perhaps you've done that (hence my comment about not knowing Parse::RecDescent), but I suspect you haven't. Trying to wade through so many lines of code to get to the actual problem makes it more difficult to assist you.

Cheers,
Ovid

Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just go the the link and check out our stats.

[princepawn]

It was pared down. If you read the post, the relevant part of the grammar was shown in the code section and then the entire grammar was included for reference.