in reply to Making sense of data: Clustering OR A coding challenge
So here's a cluster finder which uses a Genetic Algorithm based approach. I've tested it with trivial data point sets that have very clear (to human eyes) clusters. On these, it finds perfect clustering almost every time. I'd be interested to see how well it works on real-world data.
The parameters are not well isolated in this code. They are:
- Maximum number of clusters (the algorithm is free to find fewer)
- Number of generations to run
- Number of individuals to kill, clone, and mutate in each generation
- In a mutation, how many datapoints to re-cluster
use Carp; use List::Util qw( shuffle ); use strict; use warnings; # an individual represents a distribution of points among clusters. # that is, it is a specific allocation of points to clusters. # in the initial population, in each individual, the points are random +ly assigned to clusters. # each individual is an array. # each element represents a point in the data set, and its value # is the number of the cluster to which it has been assigned. my @datapoints; # The subs in Point:: need to be customized for the type/representatio +n of a "point". sub Point::set_metric; # "distance" or "area" or something like that. +small values mean "close" sub Point::as_string; sub Point::ScalarNumber::set_metric { my $set = shift; my @set = @datapoints[@$set]; @set == 0 and return 1; @set == 1 and return 2; # RMS my $total = 0; my $n = 0; for my $i ( 1 .. $#set ) { for my $j ( $i .. $#set ) { my $dist = abs( $set[$i-1] - $set[$j] ); $total += $dist ** 2; $n++; } } sqrt( $total / $n ) } sub Point::ScalarNumber::as_string { $_[0] } sub Point::NumberPair::set_metric { my $set = shift; my @set = @datapoints[@$set]; @set == 0 and return 1; @set == 1 and return 2; # RMS my $total = 0; my $n = 0; for my $i ( 1 .. $#set ) { for my $j ( $i .. $#set ) { my $dist2 = ( ( $set[$i-1][0] - $set[$j][0] ) ** 2 ) + ( ( $set[$i-1][1] - $set[$j][1] ) ** 2 ); $total += $dist2; $n++; } } sqrt( $total / $n ) } sub Point::NumberPair::as_string { "[$_[0][0],$_[0][1]]" } ###################################################################### +# my @clusters; sub Ind::new_randomized { #@datapoints <= 0 and croak "No datapoints defined!\n"; #@datapoints < 1 and croak "Only one cluster defined!\n"; #@clusters <= 0 and croak "No clusters defined!\n"; #@clusters < 1 and croak "Only one cluster defined!\n"; [ map { int( rand @clusters ) } @datapoints ] } sub Ind::clone { my $ind = shift; [ @$ind ] } # optional arg: number of points to move sub Ind::mutate { my( $ind, $n ) = @_; for my $i ( 0 .. ($n||1) ) { my $j = int( rand @datapoints ); $ind->[$j] = int( rand @clusters ); } $ind } sub Ind::_crossover_points { my $l = @datapoints; my $seglen = 1 + int rand( $l - 1 ); my $start = int rand( $l - $seglen ); ( $start .. ($start+$seglen-1) ) } sub Ind::crossover { my( $ind1, $ind2 ) = @_; my @xo = Ind::_crossover_points(); for my $i ( @xo ) { ( $ind1->[$i], $ind2->[$i] ) = ( $ind2->[$i], $ind1->[$i] ) } } sub Ind::fitness { my $ind = shift; my @cluster_points = map { my $cl = $_; [ grep { $ind->[$_] eq $cl } 0 .. $#{$ind} ] } 0 .. $#clusters; my $total_metric = 0; for my $ci ( 0 .. $#cluster_points ) { my $val = Point::set_metric( $cluster_points[$ci] ); $total_metric += $val; } 1000/$total_metric # convert it to "large = good" } sub Ind::display { my $ind = shift; my @cluster_points = map { my $cl = $_; [ grep { $ind->[$_] eq $cl } 0 .. $#{$ind} ] } 0 .. $#clusters; my $total_metric = 0; for my $ci ( 0 .. $#cluster_points ) { my $val = Point::set_metric( $cluster_points[$ci] ); $total_metric += $val; printf "$ci: Cluster $clusters[$ci]: %5.2f ( ", $val; print join ' ', map { Point::as_string($_) } @datapoints[@{$cluster_points[$ci]}]; print " )\n"; } printf "Total metric: %.2f\n", $total_metric; $ind } ###################################################################### +# if(0) { @datapoints = shuffle( 11..14, 21..24, 31..34, 41..44 ); *Point::set_metric = \&Point::ScalarNumber::set_metric; *Point::as_string = \&Point::ScalarNumber::as_string; } else { @datapoints = shuffle( [ 1, 2], [ 2, 1], [ 2, 3], [ 3, 2], [ 1,12], [ 2,11], [ 2,13], [ 3,12], [11, 2], [12, 1], [12, 3], [13, 2], [11,12], [12,11], [12,13], [13,12], ); *Point::set_metric = \&Point::NumberPair::set_metric; *Point::as_string = \&Point::NumberPair::as_string; } @clusters = ( 1 .. 4 ); my @pop = sort { $b->[0] <=> $a->[0] } map { [ Ind::fitness($_), $_ ] } map { Ind::new_randomized } 1 .. 100; #print "Before:"; printf " %.1f", $_->[0] for @pop; print "\n"; # this clones an element of @pop sub clone { [ $_[0]->[0], Ind::clone($_[0]->[1]) ] } for my $iter ( 1 .. 200 ) { # kill the bottom 30: splice @pop, @pop-30, 30; # make 10 new ones: push @pop, map { [ Ind::fitness($_), $_ ] } map { Ind::new_randomized } 1 .. 10; # clone the top 20: push @pop, map clone($_), @pop[0 .. 19]; # mutate the top 20: for my $e ( @pop[0 .. 19] ) { my $n = 1; unless ( int(rand 2) ) { $n++; unless ( int(rand 3) ) { $n++; unless ( int(rand 4) ) { $n++; } } } #warn "mut $n\n"; Ind::mutate( $e->[1], $n ); $e->[0] = Ind::fitness( $e->[1] ); } # sort by fitness again: @pop = sort { $b->[0] <=> $a->[0] } @pop; # print "Iter $iter: $pop[0][0]\n"; } # print "\nAfter:"; printf " %.1f", $_->[0] for @pop; print "\n"; Ind::display( $pop[0][1] );
Note that, as it stands, it's not doing any crossover, only mutation, so
probably it isn't a GA, technically.
I'm sure improvements could be made in this area.
We're building the house of the future together.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Making sense of data: Clustering OR A coding challenge
by belg4mit (Prior) on Apr 04, 2006 at 18:54 UTC | |
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 06, 2006 at 20:23 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom