Re^2: The Ackermann Function

in reply to Re: The Ackermann Function
in thread The Ackermann Function

I'm afraid this doesn't make sense to me. Are you suggesting that the Ackermann function should simply not be computed if the conditions for branch 3 hold? That would imply that one can only compute A(0, i) and A(i, 0), which is not particularly interesting.

I may miss your point, but I'd be a bit surprised if FSMs would be useful in this context. Can you show us what you have in mind?

Just my 2 cents, -gjb-

Comment on Re^2: The Ackermann Function

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: The Ackermann Function by NetWallah (Canon) on Jun 21, 2006 at 01:28 UTC
Oh - I beg to differ - His Noodly Appendage, the FSM is relevent in EVERY context ! "For every complex problem, there is a simple answer ... and it is wrong." --H.L. Mencken	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom