http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=856286


in reply to Re: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments
in thread Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments

Thanks for the suggestion! Is it possible to do it in a way that I can capture the content of the comment?

Ciao!
--bronto

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
  • Comment on Re^2: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Extending a Parse::RecDescent grammar for inline comments
by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 20, 2010 at 14:58 UTC
    Then it's not a comment at all (i.e. it's meaningful), and you'd match it like anything else (i.e. not use <skip>).
[reply]
[d/l]

      That's what I tried to do, actually, e.g. adding an InlineComment rule, but I failed. Do you know the correct way to do this?

      Thanks!

      Ciao!
      --bronto

      In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
[reply]
        You didn't post that code, so I can't help you find what's wrong with it.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom