<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="1007826" title="Re: Is Perl undervalued (by some people) for similar reason(s) like GNU/Linux?" created="2012-12-07 16:06:29" updated="2012-12-07 16:06:29">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="176576">
eyepopslikeamosquito</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;P&gt;
Right after clicking on your node, I clicked on [id://328478] and noticed
[id://526866], which seems relevant. :)
&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;
Without wanting to get involved, it seems there are four categories of language religious war:
 &lt;ol&gt;
  &lt;li&gt; "Open Source" (Perl,Python,Ruby,...) vs "Corporate" (Java,C#,...)
  &lt;li&gt; "Open Source" infighting: Perl vs Python vs Ruby vs PHP ... (related to [BrowserUk]'s point about "fragmentation" in the Linux world).
  &lt;li&gt; "Corporate" infighting (often involving lawsuits): Java vs C# ...
  &lt;li&gt; Fighting about type systems (static,dynamic,"weak","strong"...) (e.g. Perl/Python/Ruby vs C++/Java/C#/Haskell).
 &lt;/ol&gt;
and it is the first category above that most resembles your linked Maddog counter-argument blog post.
&lt;/P&gt;

</field>
<field name="root_node">
1007722</field>
<field name="parent_node">
1007722</field>
</data>
</node>
