<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="1011414" title="Re^7: The Most Essential Perl Development Tools Today" created="2013-01-03 03:26:07" updated="2013-01-03 03:26:07">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="171588">
BrowserUk</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;for some reason I thought you were all about clear communication &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do try :)

&lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;Some like sliced bread. others not; some like stinky cheese, other not.&lt;/small&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But these are just opinions and opinions are never right, nor wrong. They simply are. 

&lt;P&gt;If I hold an opinion, you can never say my opinion is wrong. You can disagree with that opinion; but as my opinion, it can never be wrong. Nor right.

&lt;p&gt;And if you take everyones opinions; their own personal bête noires, pet hates and blind spots, and then codify them into a tool; you set up the situation where the language will simply stagnate into a soulless, innovation quashing, piecemeal reproduction of 1960's algol-style coding.

&lt;P&gt;And the stance that "you can configure it" does stand up because if everyone configures it differently; what has been achieved? 

&lt;P&gt;Eventually -- and it has already happened in some quarters -- someone will settle on having a fixed configuration that "everyone" must abide by. But since getting "everyone", or even half a dozen significant someones, to agree upon a single configuration is impossible; "management" will decide. And since in many, even most cases, management is not equipped to understand the arguments -- heck, a lot of them go right over my head -- they will make the simplest decision. The out-of-the-box configuration will become "the standard". And no-one in the know would ever agree to that; so you end up with everyone quietly ignoring/disabling all the things they don't like, and you are back to square one. A totally shambolic waste of time and effort.


&lt;p&gt;The crux of the point I'm making is that of P::C doesn't detect errors; it simply codifies opinions. But opinions differ!


&lt;div class="pmsig"&gt;&lt;div class="pmsig-171588"&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;font size=1 &gt;
&lt;div&gt;With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
1011175</field>
<field name="parent_node">
1011403</field>
</data>
</node>
