<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="1012361" title="Re: Template simple with CGI::Application" created="2013-01-08 20:43:01" updated="2013-01-08 20:43:01">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="647953">
sundialsvc4</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;
If you have in your possession &amp;ldquo;code that works&amp;rdquo; that uses one templating-system successfully, I for one would be &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; reluctant to attempt to change it to use something else. &amp;nbsp; The logic which supports the templated displays is usually deeply rooted in how that particular templating system works. &amp;nbsp; And, I simply do not see the justification in &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; doing what the Romans do. &amp;nbsp; Please elaborate as to why you find this to be necessary ...
&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
1012300</field>
<field name="parent_node">
1012300</field>
</data>
</node>
