<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="298603" title="Re: Re: Think for yourself." created="2003-10-12 01:25:29" updated="2005-08-08 08:29:46">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="219414">
MarkM</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;With regard to my bloat argument, you have purposefully exaggerated your defense by mentioning operators that provide unique benefits that are impractical to not use. += is impractical to not use. Statement modifiers are impractical to not use. Map in void context is not nearly as necessary of a construct.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With regard to the tr/a/a/ that I mentioned, it isn't funny that I brought this up, nor is it a coincidence. I am admitting that the language has a precident for providing behaviour in un-obvious or circular implementation, that is at some point optimized for general use. Do I consider it bloat? I sure do. I brought it up, after all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for your last attempt to insult me, I suggest you re-think your motivations. I rarely ever use Java. My day-to-day programming at work is almost 100% Perl, and has been for several years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You may think Perl is perfect. I don't. I am forced to admit that Perl is practical, and so I use it. Note the difference. Not all the world is Abigail, or Perl. Didn't you just say, in this very thread, "Think for yourself"? I &lt;i&gt;am&lt;/i&gt; thinking for myself, and you are criticizing me for it. I suppose "there is more than one way to do it" really means "there is Abigail's range of doing it" and anybody who uses less as a means of improving the quality of the code, is guilty of limited thought. Sheesh.&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
296742</field>
<field name="parent_node">
296885</field>
</data>
</node>
