note adrianh <blockquote><em>As mentioned elsewhere in the comments on your post, the only realy problem with your implementation of accessors is code maintenance - you need to add each get and set and then remember to add each store to the destroyer. I bet a lot of memory leaks would appear by forgetting to do this.</em></blockquote> <p>See [id://220776] for one way to avoid the chore of maintaining a DESTROY method.</p> 218778 378576