<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="408697" title="Re^4: Perl documentation documentation" created="2004-11-18 00:29:08" updated="2005-07-28 19:13:26">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="390605">
Ytrew</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
I think it's actually a reasonable piece of documentation; it contains at least one piece of information that I didn't know for several years after using perl. Specifically, it  took me about three years before I realized that the perldoc command had the "-f" switch.
&lt;P&gt;
When I first started learning perl, I usually wanted to read the entire manual page, anyway. To my mind (and perhaps in the earlier versions of perldoc, I don't remember now), "perldoc" &lt;topic&gt; and "man" &lt;topic&gt; were essentially equivalent.
&lt;P&gt;
It wasn't until I moved to the ActiveState release of perl (with no man pages under Windows), that I realized how useful "perldoc -f" was. 
&lt;P&gt;
So I'd support the notion of "meta-documentation" for that reason alone. Additionally, online documentation written for different intended audience than the traditional CS student with a background in C and UNIX might be helpful as well.
&lt;P&gt;
--&lt;BR&gt;
Ytrew</field>
<field name="root_node">
408254</field>
<field name="parent_node">
408408</field>
</data>
</node>
