<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="62421" title="Re (tilly) 3: Perl is psychic?!" created="2001-03-06 01:50:52" updated="2005-07-21 01:25:27">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="26179">
tilly</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Whoever voted down the above node completely missed the
point.  [MrNobo1024] is completely correct in saying that
if Perl worked as documented as far back as, say, Camel 2
then it should not have had enough information to
calculate $&amp;amp;.</field>
<field name="root_node">
62398</field>
<field name="parent_node">
62401</field>
</data>
</node>
