<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="940811" title="Re: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting" created="2011-11-30 05:26:02" updated="2011-11-30 05:26:02">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="5348">
Corion</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;You will have noticed that most of the spam that gets through the defenses, and gets subsequently reaped, is not by [Anonymous Monk].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for the rest of your proposed mechanics, I don't see a future for them. The site has worked well with these mechanics for some time now, and I don't see your arguments making a case why Perlmonks should change away from them except that other mechanics seem to work well elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't see how eliminating "negativism" contributes - there are actual bad answers, and also out-of-place answers, and for both, downvotes seem to work well enough. If you take a "I don't like this" downvote as identical to "I don't like you", that's a personal problem, but nothing that this site or its mechanics can rectify.&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
940809</field>
<field name="parent_node">
940809</field>
</data>
</node>
