Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

( #3989=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2017-01-23 and 2017-01-12 (searched 0.06% of DB).


where title contains "["

Date:Author/owner:Title:Node type:
2017-01-22 kcott Re: Improve readability of Perl code. Naming reference variables. [New Perl Feature] Re:Med
2017-01-21 LanX Re^3: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-21 haukex Re^2: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-19 AnomalousMonk Re^3: [RFC] [OT] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically (updated) Re:Med
2017-01-19 AnomalousMonk Re: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-19 haukex Re^2: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically (updated) Re:Med
2017-01-19 kcott Re: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-19 Discipulus Re: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 LanX Re^2: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 duelafn Re: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 Anonymous Monk Re: [OT] Can I create a new license based on the Artistic License 2.0? Re:SoPW
2017-01-18 LanX Re^3: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 haukex Re^2: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 LanX Re: [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Re:Med
2017-01-18 haukex [RFC] Building Regex Alternations Dynamically Med
2017-01-18 Anonymous Monk Re^14: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-18 BrowserUk Re^6: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 BrowserUk Re^18: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 jdporter Re^17: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 jdporter Re^15: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 BrowserUk Re^14: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 BrowserUk Re^16: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 1nickt Re^15: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 1nickt Re^13: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 BrowserUk Re^14: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 Radiola Re: [OT] Can I create a new license based on the Artistic License 2.0? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 jdporter Re^13: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 BrowserUk Re^12: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 jdporter Re^11: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-17 ww Re: [OT] Can I create a new license based on the Artistic License 2.0? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^10: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 Anonymous Monk Re: [OT] Can I create a new license based on the Artistic License 2.0? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 jdporter Re^9: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 YellowApple [OT] Can I create a new license based on the Artistic License 2.0? SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^8: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^8: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 jdporter Re^5: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 jdporter Re^7: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 Anonymous Monk Re^4: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 Anonymous Monk Re^8: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 1nickt Re^7: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^6: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^6: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 1nickt Re^5: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 Corion Re^5: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 BrowserUk Re^4: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-16 jdporter Re^3: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-14 BrowserUk Re^2: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-14 jdporter Re: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms? Re:SoPW
2017-01-12 stevieb [SOLVED]: Can't find 'boot_...' symbol when trying to use an installed XS module SoPW

Press to continue searching remaining 99.94% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (12)
As of 2017-01-23 16:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?




    Results (194 votes). Check out past polls.