Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

by Corion (Pope)
on Nov 30, 2011 at 10:26 UTC ( #940811=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

You will have noticed that most of the spam that gets through the defenses, and gets subsequently reaped, is not by Anonymous Monk.

As for the rest of your proposed mechanics, I don't see a future for them. The site has worked well with these mechanics for some time now, and I don't see your arguments making a case why Perlmonks should change away from them except that other mechanics seem to work well elsewhere.

I don't see how eliminating "negativism" contributes - there are actual bad answers, and also out-of-place answers, and for both, downvotes seem to work well enough. If you take a "I don't like this" downvote as identical to "I don't like you", that's a personal problem, but nothing that this site or its mechanics can rectify.


Comment on Re: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
Reaped: Re^2: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by NodeReaper (Curate) on Nov 30, 2011 at 13:28 UTC
Reaped: Re^2: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by NodeReaper (Curate) on Nov 30, 2011 at 13:41 UTC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://940811]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-20 21:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (124 votes), past polls