Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

( #3989=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2014-12-19 and 2014-11-19 (searched 0.28% of DB).


where title contains "Here"

2014-12-14 NodeReaper Reaped: Re^2: Are there any refresh commands? Re:SoPW
2014-12-14 davido Re: are there any easter eggs in perl? Re:SoPW
2014-12-13 eyepopslikeamosquito Re: are there any easter eggs in perl? Re:SoPW
2014-12-13 morgon are there any easter eggs in perl? SoPW
2014-12-11 BrowserUk Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-12-11 astroboy Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-12-11 ethered ethered's scratchpad SPad
2014-12-11 ethered ethered User
2014-12-08 marto Re: Where to find CQPerlExt? Re:SoPW
2014-12-08 sotona Re^2: Where to find CQPerlExt? Re:SoPW
2014-12-08 Corion Re: Where to find CQPerlExt? Re:SoPW
2014-12-08 sotona Where to find CQPerlExt? SoPW
2014-12-04 SimonSaysCake Re: Difference between two arrays - is there a better way? Re:SoPW
2014-11-24 LanX Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-24 McA Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-24 LanX Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-24 oiskuu Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-24 Laurent_R Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-24 Tux Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-23 Laurent_R Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-21 ikegami Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-21 SuicideJunkie Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-21 sundialsvc4 Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Jenda Re^5: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Jenda Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 davido Re^5: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Anonymous Monk Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Tux Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 rsFalse Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 roboticus Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 rsFalse Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 rsFalse Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 rsFalse Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 rsFalse Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 johngg Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-20 Anonymous Monk Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 davido Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 davido Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 sundialsvc4 Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 Jenda Re: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 SuicideJunkie Re^7: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 LanX Re^5: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 LanX Re^6: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 RonW Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 SuicideJunkie Re^5: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 LanX Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 LanX Re^4: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med
2014-11-19 runrig Re^3: Opinion: where Perl5 wasn't attractive for me Re:Med

Press to continue searching remaining 99.72% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-12-20 04:43 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (95 votes), past polls