Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Parse ISO 8601 date/times

by grizzley (Chaplain)
on Nov 07, 2012 at 09:41 UTC ( #1002648=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Parse ISO 8601 date/times

\d is equivalent of [0-9] Update: Stupid UTF or other sh*t in choroba's reply below ruined my brilliant hint. Must search for my XP points somewhere else :P

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Parse ISO 8601 date/times
by roboticus (Chancellor) on Nov 07, 2012 at 10:41 UTC


    I'm guessing he used [0-9] for visual symmetry with [0-2], [0-3], et. al. I was going to suggest that it would be easier to read, but when I converted a little bit from this:

    && $part !~ m{ # Time or partial time (or period): ^(?:|P)T [012][0-9] (?:| :?[0-5][0-9] (?:| :?[0-5][0-9] ) ) (?:| [.,][0-9]+ )$ }x

    to this:

    && $part !~ m{ # Time or partial time (or period): ^(?:|P)T [012]\d (?:| :?[0-5]\d (?:| :?[0-5]\d ) ) (?:| [.,]\d+ )$ }x

    I found that the better 'visual balance' of [0-9] was counterbalanced by the square brackets, which are a little too similar to vertical bars for my eyes. After looking at them both, I don't really have a preference--Perhaps if I had a better font...


    When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.

      I agree. [0-9] is visually better in this case.
Re^2: Parse ISO 8601 date/times
by choroba (Bishop) on Nov 07, 2012 at 11:59 UTC
    Oh really?
    $d = chr(2413); print $d =~ $_, "\n" for qr/\d/, qr/[0-9]/;
    لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

      Yeah, I just don't ever use \d except for one-liners any more. \d now means something that I just never want: numerals of any kind, from any writing system. This despite Perl only knowing how to treat one of the two dozenish types of numerals as numeric. I think drastically changing the definition of \d when Unicode came along was a mistake (a separate way of saying "any numeral" should have been used).

      Luckily, the somewhat longer [0-9] has some visual advantages. So the worst problem is all of the old scripts that are now broken in ways that will often not matter (but that I can see even causing security problems in rare cases).

      - tye        

        The following pragma will "fix" \d. However, re::engine::Plugin does not currently support s/// or split //, just matching. (And it doesn't support named captures either.) Still, it may be helpful for some.

        use 5.010; use strict; use utf8::all; BEGIN { package re::engine::SaneDigits; no thanks; use constant TAINT => ${^TAINT}; use re::engine::Plugin (); use Carp; sub import { re::engine::Plugin->import( comp => \&comp, exec => \&exec, ); } *unimport = \&re::engine::Plugin::unimport; sub comp { my ($rx) = @_; my $real = $rx->pattern; $real =~ s{\\d}{[0-9]}g; $real =~ s{\\D}{[^0-9]}g; my %mods = my %mod = $rx->mod; my $mods = join q(), keys %mods; $real =~ s{/}{\/}g; $real = eval qq{ qr/$real/$mods }; $rx->stash({ real => $real }); $rx->num_captures( FETCH => sub { my ($rx, $paren) = @_; croak sprintf( "%s variable not supported with %s", { 0 => q($&), -1 => q($'), -2 => q($`) }->{$paren} +, __PACKAGE__, ) if $paren < 1; my $rv = $rx->stash->{last}[$paren]; return $rv unless TAINT; $rv =~ /(.*)/; return $1; }, ); } sub exec { my ($rx, $str) = @_; my @results = ($str =~ $rx->stash->{real}); unshift @results, scalar pos; $rx->stash->{last} = \@results; return not defined $results[0]; } }; my $str = "foo23 bar5 bar42"; say $str =~ m/bar(\d+)/i ? "GOT $1" : "NO MATCH"; use re::engine::SaneDigits; say $str =~ m/bar(\d+)/i ? "GOT $1" : "NO MATCH";

        Update: Meh... come to think of it, a re::engine is overkill. Constant overloading does the trick much easier...

        use 5.010; use strict; use utf8::all; BEGIN { package re::SaneDigits; no thanks; use overload (); my %_const_handlers = (qr => \&_qr); my %_remove_handlers = map { $_ => undef } %_const_handlers; sub import { overload::constant %_const_handlers } sub unimport { overload::remove_constant %_remove_handlers } sub _qr { for (@_) { s/\\d/[0-9]/g; s/\\D/[^0-9]/g; return $_; } } }; my $str = "foo23 bar5 bar42"; say $str =~ m/bar(\d+)/i ? "GOT $1" : "NO MATCH"; use re::SaneDigits; say $str =~ m/bar(\d+)/i ? "GOT $1" : "NO MATCH";

        Another CPAN candidate I think.

        Update II: Looks like PerlMonks might be breaking my UTF8 again. The "5" character which appears in $str should not be a normal ASCII 5, but a fullwidth 5 (U+U+FF15), which is a character used to include an Arabic numeral 5 within CJK text.

        perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1002648]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-02-17 23:21 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...

    Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.