Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help

by perltux (Beadle)
on Nov 12, 2012 at 13:07 UTC ( #1003434=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help
in thread just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help

I might start using github or something like that once the code is a bit more mature. Right now I'm working so much on it still that the overhead of using a version control system would be a hindrance for me especially since I have no experience with them (other than some experience with cvs 10-15 years ago and I hated it! ;) ) so I would first have to learn how to use git.

That said if you are offering to collaborate on the code, then let me know, I'm sure we can work something out! :)


Comment on Re^2: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help
Re^3: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help
by choroba (Abbot) on Nov 12, 2012 at 13:09 UTC
    Believe me, the overhead of using a version control system is negligible compared to the overhead of not using it.
    لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ
      I'm sure you are right, but the overhead of first learning how to use it is not negligible! :)

      Seriously I certainly see the point in using one once more than one person works on the code, but right now it's only me.

      Again if anyone wants to collaborate, just let me know and I'll start learning how to use git and github.

        As well as code colaboration, a project Wiki and issue tracking git is also very handy for people wanting to download your works:

        git clone https://github.com/chromatic/modern_perl_book.git

        I would second choroba's suggestion to use a revision control system of some sort (git, svn). It allows you to 'erase' mistakes or back track to a point where your code was working. It is also nice to be able to take multiple divergent paths when testing out if something will work, and to be able to select the parts that work best.

        --MidLifeXis

Re^3: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help
by petdance (Parson) on Nov 12, 2012 at 17:22 UTC
    How much overhead is it if you accidentally delete working code? Or if you change previously-working code and then you don't discover it for days and now you can't go back and figure out what your change was that broke it, and for that matter, you don't even know what your last working code looked like?

    xoxo,
    Andy

Re^3: just wanted to show what I managed to write with your help
by GrandFather (Cardinal) on Nov 12, 2012 at 19:47 UTC

    Your thinking is exactly backwards! Revision control systems are to help you and to save you arse when you do something dumb (and believe me, we all do dumb things). At the very least set up a git (or Mercurial) repository for each project you are working on right now. You don't need to share the repo now, or ever, but you get no benefit at all from it at the end of the project!

    You may find Mercurial easier to get your head around than git, especially if you can use TortoiseHg (Wikipedia article). Modern systems like git and Mercurial take a snapshot of the current state of your project and deal with your entire project as an entity. CVS was a file at a time system and made a lot of stuff hard to do and difficult to understand.

    True laziness is hard work

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1003434]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-07-31 07:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (245 votes), past polls