Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re: Html:treebuilder vs Html:treebuilder:xpath vs Html:treebuilder:LibXML

by CountZero (Bishop)
on Nov 26, 2012 at 07:34 UTC ( #1005583=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Html:treebuilder vs Html:treebuilder:xpath vs Html:treebuilder:LibXML

From their documentation:
  • HTML::TreeBuilder : Parser that builds a HTML syntax tree.
  • HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath : This module adds typical XPath methods to HTML::TreeBuilder, to make it easy to query a document.
  • HTML::TreeBuilder::LibXML : HTML::TreeBuilder::LibXML is drop-in-replacement for HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath. This module doesn't implement all of HTML::TreeBuilder and HTML::Element APIs, but enough methods are defined so modules like Web::Scraper work.
For large documents HTML::TreeBuilder could become rather slow and then HTML::TreeBuilder::LibXML is a replacement to consider.


A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics
  • Comment on Re: Html:treebuilder vs Html:treebuilder:xpath vs Html:treebuilder:LibXML

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005583]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2016-10-21 21:42 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (291 votes). Check out past polls.