Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Cowboy Neal with Hat
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: how do I efficiently remove one hash from another?

by davido (Archbishop)
on Nov 27, 2012 at 07:11 UTC ( #1005803=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to how do I efficiently remove one hash from another?

Whether the loop is explicit, or implicit, there's a loop. But one cool means is:

delete @hash1{ keys %hash2 };

...which is pretty much the same thing as...

delete $hash1{$_} for keys %hash2;

...but with an implicit loop (via the hash slice) rather than the explicit 'for' loop. Note in either case, there's no need to worry about checking exists: delete doesn't complain if the element doesn't already exist.


Dave


Comment on Re: how do I efficiently remove one hash from another?
Select or Download Code
Re^2: how do I efficiently remove one hash from another?
by perltux (Beadle) on Nov 27, 2012 at 07:18 UTC
    Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Re^2: how do I efficiently remove one hash from another?
by tobyink (Abbot) on Nov 27, 2012 at 10:26 UTC

    The former compiles to a much smaller op tree than the latter:

    perl -MO=Concise -e'delete @hash1{keys %hash2}' perl -MO=Concise -e'delete $hash1{$_} for keys %hash2'

    On my machine, the slice performs about 20% faster than the loop.

    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'
      The slice option only calls delete once. It also doesn't have to go the trouble of assigning $_ for each element. So that makes sense.


      When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct? --Larry Wall

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005803]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-04-21 08:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (492 votes), past polls