Re: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

[MidLifeXis]

in reply to LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

I am failing to see a question in your comments. I will assume that your question is along the lines of "why, if HTTP::Tiny has this protection, does not LWP?"

Perhaps you can make a case for it on the mailing list (as found on the LWP documentation page), or create a patch and submit it on the github repository.

[OlegG]

Question is in subject of this topic

[zwon]

Answer to this question is in the body of the question ;) As you can see from the code it is not handling SIGPIPE itself. On the other hand nothing prevents you from setting handler in your script from which you're using LWP.

[OlegG]

If so, then it is a bug. Because it is even not documented, that I should install sigpipe handler myself.
Ok, it seems I should make test and report it.