|There's more than one way to do things|
Re^13: Hash order randomization is coming, are you ready?by demerphq (Chancellor)
|on Dec 04, 2012 at 07:45 UTC||Need Help??|
but not reasoning for changing the hash algorithm itself
Sure it is. A strong hash function is harder to attack.
why you would do it on a hash-by-hash basis rather than a per-process basis.
Concerns over information exposure of key order to an attacker.
I don't get the reluctance to share this information?
If there is any reluctance it is purely that of me wanting to avoid a long dialog repeating what has already been said elsewhere. I have a lot of demands on my time these days.