|Think about Loose Coupling|
Re^3: Request help for work around for bug in perl 5.10.1 (leaks)by tye (Sage)
|on Dec 12, 2012 at 22:27 UTC||Need Help??|
That assert also appears in sv_clear().
Indeed! In fact, that assertion is likely the culprit. I previously missed that line from my "git grep SVTYPEMASK perl-5.10.1" output.
But now I realize that the assertion that I pointed out can't be the one that is to blame because it uses "!(...==...)" which might well get changed by the optimizer into "...!=..." but such an optimization would not impact the string that the C preprocessor produces and that gets included in the error message.
So the "weak ref" stuff was a red herring.
So this bug is a little more mundane. We have a scalar with a ref count of 0 that has been freed that is trying to be cleared again. Eliminating XS modules (or up- or down-grading them) can still be useful, but is not as likely to matter as with the more mysterious scenario of a rogue weak ref being destroyed, IME.
The smell of this bug is becoming more similar to "subtle bugs in Perl that only seem to appear in long-running Perl daemons". So the bug might stop happening if the daemon can be made to run something like:
Every so often (like once per day).
Update: Use of "threads" still seems plausible as a major contributing factor.