As I previously suggested, read and understand the documentation, this is all explained there. If you don't understand the benifit of pp, why are you using it?
| [reply] |
One year ago I read everything I needed to know about PAR::Packer, if I would have read about the possibility to unzip the executables, I would never have used it. I can remember reading people using it to protect their sources. Well in a way it does, but just a very little. Very strange to create a zip file takes 45 minutes for just a few hundred lines of code...... That being said, it brought me a step closer to what I wanted, and I'm grateful for that. That's life sometimes you take a wrong turn, to find later on you need to go back. So I will start my search on a real compiling solution, if there is any Any suggestions for a good wiki on to compile .pl files to .exe, on Windows which are real compilers, not packers
| [reply] |
"One year ago I read everything I needed to know about PAR::Packer, if I would have read about the possibility to unzip the executables, I would never have used it."
Apparently you didn't read everything you needed to know about PAR::Packer.
"I can remember reading people using it to protect their sources."
Impossible, they were mistaken and you took their word for it over the clearly documented advice.
"Any suggestions for a good wiki on to compile .pl files to .exe, on Windows which are real compilers, not packers."
If you're looking for a reliable, production worthy solution you're out of luck.
Update: there are several interested threads here on hiding the source, decompiling and reverse engineering, some of which cover Perl as well as other languages. Super Search is your friend.
| [reply] |