Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Irrational numbers

by BrowserUk (Pope)
on Dec 18, 2012 at 16:04 UTC ( #1009421=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Irrational numbers
in thread Irrational numbers

You are competing against something that the hardware can do in as little as one cpu cycle.

It is actually much worse than that these days. Most physical simulation games lend themselves very nicely to being programmed for GPUs, in which case he would be competing with not just 1 FP calc per cycle, but dozens or even hundreds of FP multiply-add calculations per cycle.

And a single call to his closure-based lazy irrationals would take hundreds of cycles per digit.

Even if he dropped into C and avoided Perl's sub call overheads; calculating each digit using a polynomial -- Taylor series or similar -- will still take dozens of cycles.

We are talking 2 or 3 (even 4!) orders of magnitude slower calculations in order to achieve accuracy that simply isn't required.


With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

RIP Neil Armstrong


Comment on Re^4: Irrational numbers

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1009421]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-09-18 21:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (124 votes), past polls