Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: A more concise way to map the contents of an array.

by LanX (Canon)
on Dec 30, 2012 at 14:03 UTC ( #1010924=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: A more concise way to map the contents of an array.
in thread A more concise way to map the contents of an array.

Yes ... negating means evaluating in boolean context!

(well "pure" is a risky adjective in the sphere of Perl's DWIM flexibility ... ;)

Anyway if this approach ever fails it certainly is a bug!

EDIT:

IMHO people prefer using 0 for false because it's easier to print and read than an empty string. But technically this is not necessary.

Cheers Rolf

) lets say "well-defined"!


Comment on Re^5: A more concise way to map the contents of an array.
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: A more concise way to map the contents of an array.
by Amblikai (Beadle) on Dec 30, 2012 at 14:31 UTC

    Ok, thanks again for your help!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1010924]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (17)
As of 2015-08-04 20:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The oldest computer book still on my shelves (or on my digital media) is ...













    Results (74 votes), past polls