Re: Evolving a faster filter?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Jan 05, 2013 at 08:31 UTC||Need Help??|
It needs to run fast, fast, fast.
Hm. Not a lot to go on. A sanitised peak at one or two of your filters would be nice.
How does reducing 100,000 objects to 9193 by filtering them on each of 100 hundred fields in 3/4 second stack up?
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.