in reply to Re^4: Operator precedence
in thread Operator precedence
to make things clear? I would NEVER use that construct.
I wasn't advocating it, I was just amused by it :)
That said, I think the terms confuse things because they mean nothing, How about:
open( FH, '<', $ARGV[ 2 ] ) or die( "$! : $ARGV[ 2 ]" ) if $ARGV[ 2 ];
Or:
eval $code or die $@ if $code;
Doesn't seem so uncommon once you substitute realistic terms.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^6: Operator precedence
by Tux (Canon) on Jan 20, 2013 at 15:35 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 20, 2013 at 17:01 UTC | |
by Tux (Canon) on Jan 20, 2013 at 18:49 UTC |
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom